A month and a half
ago, I was fortunate enough to have some varicose veins removed on the NHS.
They had been causing me discomfort for some time, and occasionally bleeding.
When I initially asked my doctor he told me that I could have them removed
privately for "very little cost." I asked him how much he
meant by very little. He said "about £2000." I didn't bother
telling him how hard it would be for me to find that amount of money. But when
they bled again I returned to him, and expressed concern about them
complicating into DVT. He begrudgingly referred me to a surgeon, who took one
look at them and agreed that they should be removed.
I understood how
fortunate I had been. I love the NHS. I'll support it at every opportunity,
especially now when it seems like people are looking for reasons to make it
look bad. And whether or not he did it begrudgingly, my doctor did refer me,
thus sparing me lots of discomfort down the line.
At Chelsea and
Westminster Hospital I was fortunate to have an excellent surgeon in Dr. Gibbs,
and the anaesthetist totally put me at my ease before knocking me out, which is
handy considering I freak out at needles. When I awoke, the surgeon was very
clear about what was to happen next.
"The operation
was a complete success. But you need to make an appointment with your GP in two
weeks time. You have three stitches that need to be removed at the surgery. *indicating
my groin area* The paper ones on your leg will fall off of their own
accord, but if they don't, just pull them off in a couple of weeks. Don't
forget to make an appointment with your GP. Keep renewing the dressing in your
groin until you have the stitches taken out."
Very clear. He gave me
a letter as well, and used highlighter pen over the section saying that some
stitches needed to be removed. So I did everything according to his
instructions. A week or so after the surgery, I started to develop a rash
around the area of the incision in my groin, roughly in the shape of the
dressing. I was concerned by this, and treated it very carefully. I thought it
might be an allergic reaction to the dressing but since I had never had a
surgery wound before, I was concerned. About the rash, and also about how the
wound appeared to be constantly open. I had been very active right after the
surgery, working on the boats for hours some days, and walking in the park. I
was worried that some crap from the Thames had got in it. I was looking forward
to having my fears laid to rest, and counting the days until the stitch removal
when that would happen.
I had made an
appointment with the nurse rather than the doctor for the stitches. My last few
flatmates have been nurses so I know that nurses remove stitches - (Tara used
to love it. Had she still been here I probably would have got her to do it and
this whole sorry nonsense wouldn't have happened). So I rang my surgery and
asked if I should see the doctor or the nurse to have stitches removed. They
said the nurse. So off I went. I didn't bring the letter from the surgeon, as
it said nothing specific.
It's a sunny morning,
and I am in a good mood. I am looking forward to getting advice on the rash,
and having my mind put at rest about the upturned edges of the wound. I bound
into the nurses room:
"Hello! I
need to have three stitches removed! I should warn you though, I think I've had
a reaction to the dressing, so the skin is raised around the incision wound.
It's pretty unpleasant. I'm worried about it to be honest - could you have a
look?"
I show her. She gets
me to lie down, puts some cream on a cloth, and before I realise what she is
doing she jams the cloth into the scabbing, rubbing right over the top of the
open wound. This is completely at odds with how gingerly I have been treating
it all week. It also hurts and comes with no warning.
"Ow!"
She stops. I am instantly really angry - I feel weirdly violated. "What the hell do you think you're doing?" (Not
the right way to start this, but I am feeling violated.)
"I have to
remove the scabbing so that I can properly see where the stitches are."
"You should
have warned me. Also you were going right at the incision wound. Careful of
that."
"Yes of
course. can I carry on?"
"Yes
of course."
She
then pokes around for a while. "You have no stitches."
(Still
angry. Still doing myself no favours.) "What are you talking about? I
have three - it's probably just that the skin around the wound is raised
because of the rash. I definitely have three stitches that need to be removed
by you today."
"Do
you have your surgeon's letter?"
"No
- I left it at home. But all it says is that there are stitches. It doesn't say
where or how many. But the surgeon pointed at my groin and said the number
three. And that was the main incision so one would assume..."
"I
can't do anything without the surgeon's letter."
"Well
I don't have it. Can you just find the three stitches and remove them? I
definitely have three."
"I
can't do anything without the surgeons letter."
(So I
continue to be a dick.) "God. Ok, fine I'll get the sodding letter and
it won't say anything more than what I've told you. It says stitches need to be
removed by your GP after 2 weeks. I'm here. It has been 2 weeks. You're not my
GP but you're the nurse so that's fine. I can get this bloody letter if you
need, but if I get it will you remove the stitches for me?"
"I
can't do anything without the surgeon's letter."
"Please
just get the stitches out."
"The
stitches he was referring to are the paper sutures on your leg. I can remove
them for you?"
"No,
God no - I can do that myself. You'll probably take the scab off with them. You
really want me to go home and get this letter?"
"I
can't do anything without the..."
"Oh
for fuck's sake ok fine whatever."
Me, and rage: when I
walk into a lamp post, my instant reaction is rage. Rage at the lamp post. That
bloody lamp post how dare it hit me! This is always my first reaction to
unexpected pain. I kick out at it. But also she unexpectedly caused me pain in
a really intimate area, where I had invested a lot of concern. I really didn't
want to have a septic groin. So I was angry, needlessly and stupidly angry. And
I was doing myself no favours. And then she tapped into my pet hate - people
being officious and stating the rules in the absence of common sense. Nothing
makes me angrier than the whole "It was in the terms and conditions when
you signed up for X". I get like Michael Douglas in Falling Down when they won't serve him
breakfast.
I was still fuming
when I got back into the surgery clutching the letter. I marched up to the
reception brandishing it.
"I need to
make an appointment with the doctor. Your nurse is an incompetent."
(The nurse is, of course, in earshot. I'm really not interested in doing myself
any favours here.)
But they fit me in -
brilliantly. I think the nurse has had enough of me. The doctor, however, is
not particularly interested in giving creedence to the fact that I know I have
three stitches in me. He is more concerned with closing ranks with the nurse. In
fact he barely looks at the wound, and tells me I have no stitches. I'm calmer
now. I say I do. He says I don't. I tell him he is going to send me away with
stitches in my wound.
He shrugs. "If
you do have stitches that aren't removed then your body will reject them. The
worst that can happen is that you'll get an abscess."
"Great. Well,
I'll see you when I get the abscess."
"Do you want
the nurse to remove your paper sutures?"
"I'm not
letting her anywhere near me. Look, please - the surgeon told me I have
stitches that need to be removed. Why would he do that if I didn't?"
"I used to be
a surgeon. Stitches that need to be removed have a bobble on them. I can't see
anything like that in your wound."
So I go home. That
evening, I carefully take off the paper sutures on my leg and discover TWO BLUE
STITCHES WITH BOBBLES ON THEM in one of the wounds on my leg. My leg! dammit I
thought it was my groin. That was where the surgeon indicated. My leg? Now I
look like a twat. I poke around looking for a third, but to no avail. "Weird,"
I think. "I wonder where I got the number three from." I go in
the next day, and ask the nurse to remove them. We are courteous to one
another. I ask her if she might look for a third stitch. She says there are
only two. I feel like I have been a dick. I apologise to her for my behaviour
the previous day. I am annoyed with myself - I was sure the surgeon was indicating
my groin. Why would he have done that if there was nothing to remove there?
Either way, I should have been more calm and then we would have probably found
the stitches in the first appointment and there wouldn't have had to be so much
bad karma floating around. The nurse does not apologise back. She uses my
apology to explain how I was wrong.
"If you had told
me they were in your leg...!"
I respond - "Well,
yes. But in the end, I'm the patient here."
Weeks pass. As for the
wound in my groin, it remains open. Constantly weeping. I am cleaning it
carefully and regularly and trying to stop it from going septic and wondering
when it's going to heal. Operation scars are a new thing to me, and they don't
seem to work like normal cuts and bruises, I think. I know there isn't a stitch
in it, but I wish the flesh wasn't turned up like that. I worry it might scar.
I assume I am being too active, but I can't bear not to be. It's a constant
background worry, but I try not to let it get in the way.
A month later I am
dancing in my kilt at a wedding, when I feel the half closed wound open yet
again. IDIOT! Why am I dancing when I know this wound isn't healing properly?
Especially considering I've been cancelling shifts on the boats, worrying that being on a speedboat
won't help the healing process one little bit. I don't want to go to my doctor.
I've already wasted their time, besides they'd just talk down to me and tell me
it was normal for that sort of wound. I ignore it, but it keeps bothering me.
At home the next
evening I decide to get some light on it and shortsightedly peer and poke at
it. My eyesight is not good at the best of times. My lenses are a very old
prescription and I lost my glasses on holiday so I only have sunglasses without
them. But oh my God what is this? Stitches! Two knotty bobbles either end of a
ligature running the length of the wound. I get a really close look and realise
that the weeping is coming from the holes where at the top and bottom where it
punches through the skin. That night I hardly sleep at all. The next morning I
am at my GP as the surgery opens, and thankfully the nurse has a slot first
thing. By this stage I am not interested in "I told you so."
although I am very glad that I was not delusional. I just want the damn thing
out of my body. There is already some scar tissue that there wouldn't have been
if it had been taken out when I first came in, but nobody tends to see me naked
- although I have stood on stage stripped to the bollocks. But I'd never need
to look perfect - I'm no porn star.
So I say to her "I
need to have a stitch removed from my groin."
She knows me. "Another
one?"
"No, the same
one as before. It's been there for a month now keeping the wound open."
She takes a look.
Then, quite astonishingly, she gets a large pair of big blue tweezers. I calmly
think they are some sort of cutter, until - again with no warning and no sense
- she actually yanks the top knot upwards, trying to pull the bottom knot
through the wound and out the other side. I am getting deja vu here. This great
big knot slides wetly into the hole in my skin and then jams on scar tissue as
it travels through the wound.
"Ow! What the
hell do you think you're doing?" (Again)
"I have to
pull it out.”
"Well, yes,
God, but there's a bloody great knot on the bottom - surely you should cut it
off before pulling it through the wound?"
"There wasn't
a knot on the bottom."
"Of course
there was a bloody knot on the bottom. I looked at it really closely."
"There
wasn't a knot on the bottom."
"There
was. It was bigger than the one on the top. You've just yanked it into the
wound!"
"There
wasn't a knot. It's just a bit of scab, like this." *she shows me
a bit of scab, as if that explained everything* She is world weary in tone now,
fed up of this delusional idiot, patronising. I am really trying hard to remain
measured. I will not allow another atmosphere like last time. Despite her
protestations she starts digging in the hole into which she has pulled the
knot, sticking the unsterilised blue plastic tweezers right into the wound,
trying to pull the knot back the way it came. Which implies that she might
realise she's made a mistake.
"Stop a
second. Look, the only reason I came back to you was so it was on my record
that there WAS a stitch in my groin. I could have cut it and taken it out
myself. I wish I had now. I almost did because I was scared you'd do something
like this. This is unbelievable."
"Wait here."
"No it's fine
let's just get this done."
"No - wait
here. If you are calling my competence into question I have to get the doctor."
She leaves the room,
and comes back with a doctor - a different doctor from the first time, thankfully.
The nurse tells the
doctor that I am kicking up a fuss because I think there is a knot on the end
of the stitch she is pulling through my wound, whereas I am mistaken and it is
just a bit of scab. I tell the doctor how she has just unnecessarily pulled a
great big bobble halfway into my wound and ask her if she thinks it's better to
try and pull it back the way it came and cut it off, or to just get it all the
way through now. The doctor - this one - takes a tiny bit of time to understand
the problem and the history of the problem. She appears willing to listen. The
nurse however is using her talking to an idiot voice "There was a
little bit of scab on the bottom of the stitch and you are saying it is a knot.
There is no knot." I am totally past caring. "Please,"
I say to the doctor. "Just get it out. I don't care how much it hurts.
I don't want it in me any more." The nurse types something on the
computer and asks the doctor to look at it. I assume it's something about me.
It doesn't matter. Nevertheless, carefully and slowly thank god, the doctor
manages to pull the stitch all the way through. It hurts because there IS a
bloody great bobble on the end. The doctor shows it to me. It's the larger of
the two knots. The nurse is now silent and withdrawn, looking at the screen
where she has written something. The doctor apologises, even though she has
done nothing but good. The nurse says nothing. I thank the doctor for her
apology and make a note to myself that if I ever need to come back I should come
on a Tuesday.
Now what upsets me
about this whole episode is that - apart from the final doctor - nobody ever appeared
to think that what I had to say about my own body and what was wrong with it
had any relevance. As someone that lives in my body all the time, surely my
opinion is worth something? But both the first doctor and the nurse were
unwilling to accept what I had to say, in the matter of the surgeon's letter,
and in the matter of my own pain and understanding of my healing process. In
fact they didn't ask me any questions or seek to understand anything. I very
quickly lost my faith in the nurse, and I never have qualms about making it
clear to people when that happens. But on the first visit I felt so talked down
to, that had I not found the stitch in my groin, I would have been very
unwilling to go back to the doctor unless I was puking blood. Also I had an
allergic reaction to a dressing. No interest was taken about that - surely it
could be useful to have on file for future reference?
It is this kind of
episode, taken in isolation, that allows for those who are looking for the
cracks to attack the NHS. And it was so needless. I was moody, but lots of sick
people are moody. I made matters far worse for myself but shouldn't they treat
the disease not the patient?
We make our opinions
based on our experience. It is easy to go from the particular to the general.
Someone on twitter asked me "How is it the NHS at fault when it is only 1
doctor?" If I was punched by a Chelsea fan I could be forgiven for
thinking that all Chelsea fans are bastards. It may be irrational, but it is
often how we work. Nonetheless, this was to do with the NHS,
but not the fault of the NHS - the hospital was fantastic. My
nurse, and the aftercare just sucked.
But is this slipshod
aftercare endemic? I am healthy, outspoken and determined. I avoided infection
(thus far) and had enough basic knowledge to get things fixed for myself
eventually, even if I put up with an open wound for too long as I didn't know
how a surgical wound might behave. But someone more afraid than me or more
vulnerable than me might well have ended up in a far worse situation a few
months from now with a septic groin. All I lost was a couple of shifts at work
and a bit of confidence. Someone else could have lost their willy. The attitude
of both the first doctor and the nurse was from the same dangerously flawed
standpoint: "I am knowledgeable and qualified. This person is not.
Therefore I am right, and this person is wrong." With internet self-diagnosis
everybody thinks they have cancer if they have a lump on their tongue, but
surely this is not enough to dismiss everything the patient has to say for
themselves?
I suppose I'm
disappointed. I want to believe that the NHS is fantastic, even as Nye Bevan
spins in his grave at what's happening to it. I think I will continue to
believe in it. But if the wolves were closing in on me, and I worked in
healthcare, I would do everything in my power to prove the detractors wrong and
provide the best possible service. More and more I am considering - if my
career ever takes a turn for the better - getting health insurance. In ten
years time I fear that the wonderful experience I had with the surgeon - which
cannot be overlooked in all this - would be impossible for anybody. In that
sense I was extremely fortunate. But if I ever end up in front of that nurse
again I will scream and run away, even if she has already accidentally
amputated my legs.
No comments:
Post a Comment